2005 Audi A6 vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,722 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1967 Mercury Park Lane.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (602 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A6. (320 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A6 | 1967 Mercury Park Lane | |
| Make | Audi | Mercury |
| Model | A6 | Park Lane |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 6722 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 602 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1360 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3130 mm |
