2005 Audi A6 vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 415 kg more than 2005 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A6 | Brougham |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 79 L |