2005 Audi A6 vs. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 561 kg more than 2005 Audi A6.
Because 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A6 | 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | A6 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 6750 cc |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 2206 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 107 L |
