2005 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A6. (310 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A6 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 4995 cc |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |