2005 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (218 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (86 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A6 | 1982 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Audi | Fiat |
| Model | A6 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1116 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 218 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 86 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2460 mm |
