2005 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1982 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (320 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1982 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 3271 cc |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 228 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2830 mm |