2005 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A6 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | A6 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |
