2005 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (255 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 665 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (320 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1982 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A6 | Omega |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2670 mm |