2005 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (335 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (420 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A6 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | A6 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2160 mm |
