2005 Audi A6 vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,495 cc, 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 620 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (320 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A6 | CJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 150 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1290 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2380 mm |