2005 Audi A6 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A6 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | A6 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 36 L |
