2005 Audi A6 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (187 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A6 | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A6 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.3 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.1 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
