2005 Audi A6 vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (218 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (190 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (306 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | A6 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 3947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 93 L |