2005 Audi A6 vs. 1996 BMW Z3
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,495 cc, 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1996 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (320 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (180 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1996 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | A6 | Z3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1897 cc |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 186 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |