2005 Audi A6 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,495 cc, 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (320 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A6 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1590 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 139 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2210 mm |