2005 Audi A6 vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A6. (230 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 2002 BMW M3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | A6 | M3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 480 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2890 mm |