2005 Audi A6 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 230 kg more than 2005 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A6. (330 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A6 | XJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2965 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 541 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3040 mm |