2005 Audi A6 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 305 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A6. (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A6.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Audi A6 2003 Nissan X-Trail
Make Audi Nissan
Model A6 X-Trail
Year Released 2005 2003
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1779 cc 2488 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 177 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1595 kg 1290 kg
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 60 L