2005 Audi A6 vs. 2008 Buick Lucerne
To start off, 2008 Buick Lucerne is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Buick Lucerne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Buick Lucerne (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Buick Lucerne should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Buick Lucerne weights approximately 27 kg more than 2005 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (310 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Buick Lucerne. (309 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Buick Lucerne.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 2008 Buick Lucerne | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | A6 | Lucerne |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 3791 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 309 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1617 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2940 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |