2005 Audi A6 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 122 kg more than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A6. (320 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A6 | CTS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 3564 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 307 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 374 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 249 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.5 seconds | 6.6 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1788 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |