2005 Audi A6 vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 1800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2012 Ford Falcon. (240 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 12 kg more than 2012 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A6. (350 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 1800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.8 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |