2005 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A6 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 49 kg more than 2005 Audi A6.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ferrari California. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A6. (350 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A6. 2005 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 2013 Ferrari California has manual transmission. 2013 Ferrari California will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 2013 Ferrari California | |
Make | Audi | Ferrari |
Model | A6 | California |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 504 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1709 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4562 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1308 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 78 L |