2005 Audi A8 vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type

To start off, 2005 Audi A8 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A8 (335 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar E Type. (226 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar E Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A8 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1968 Jaguar E Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Audi A8 1968 Jaguar E Type
Make Audi Jaguar
Model A8 E Type
Year Released 2005 1968
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4178 cc 4235 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 335 HP 226 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 92.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93 mm 106 mm
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1945 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1190 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 63 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]