2005 Audi A8 vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Audi A8 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 9 kg more than 2005 Audi A8.
Because 2005 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A8 | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | A8 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 6750 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 2154 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 107 L |
