2005 Audi A8 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2005 Audi A8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,998 cc, 2005 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A8 (450 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 353 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2005 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A8 (560 Nm) has 421 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A8 | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A8 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1590 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 139 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2210 mm |