2005 Audi A8 vs. 2012 Kia Venga
To start off, 2012 Kia Venga is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A8 would be higher. At 5,998 cc, 2005 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A8 (450 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 361 more horse power than 2012 Kia Venga. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2012 Kia Venga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A8 weights approximately 435 kg more than 2012 Kia Venga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Kia Venga. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A8 (560 Nm) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Kia Venga. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Kia Venga.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A8 | 2012 Kia Venga | |
Make | Audi | Kia |
Model | A8 | Venga |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1396 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 17:01 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 1710 kg |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 48 L |