2005 Audi Allroad vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2005 Audi Allroad is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi Allroad is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi Allroad (296 HP) has 256 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi Allroad should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi Allroad weights approximately 656 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi Allroad | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | Allroad | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |
