2005 Audi Allroad vs. 1962 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2005 Audi Allroad is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 269 kg more than 2005 Audi Allroad.
Because 2005 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi Allroad. (380 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi Allroad.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi Allroad | 1962 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | Allroad | Sixty |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 2135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |