2005 Audi Allroad vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi Allroad. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi Allroad would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 2005 Audi Allroad. (300 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi Allroad. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi Allroad weights approximately 26 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS-V.
Because 2005 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi Allroad. (381 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi Allroad.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi Allroad | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | Allroad | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 548 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 381 Nm | 747 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1940 kg | 1914 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |