2005 Audi RS4 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Audi RS4 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (158 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi RS4 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | RS4 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 376 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4690 mm |