2005 Audi RS4 vs. 2004 BMW M3
To start off, 2005 Audi RS4 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2004 BMW M3. (317 HP @ 7250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2005 Audi RS4.
Because 2005 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi RS4 (449 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 2005 Audi RS4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi RS4 | 2004 BMW M3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | RS4 | M3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 3169 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 376 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 449 Nm | 355 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.1 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.7 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 63 L |