2005 Audi RS4 vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi RS4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi RS4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 124 kg more than 2005 Audi RS4.
Because 2005 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ferrari California. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi RS4. (449 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi RS4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi RS4 | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Audi | Ferrari |
| Model | RS4 | California |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 376 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 449 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 78 L |
