2005 Audi RS6 vs. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 355 kg more than 2005 Audi RS6.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (583 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi RS6. (560 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi RS6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi RS6 | 1963 Cadillac Biarritz | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | RS6 | Biarritz |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4171 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 583 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 75 L |