2005 Audi RS6 vs. 1963 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 310 kg more than 2005 Audi RS6.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi RS6. (560 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi RS6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi RS6 | 1963 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | RS6 | Sixty |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 582 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 79 L |