2005 Audi RS6 vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 535 kg more than 2005 Audi RS6.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi RS6 | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Audi | Lincoln |
| Model | RS6 | Continental |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3210 mm |
