2005 Audi RS6 vs. 1967 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1967 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi RS6 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1967 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi RS6 | 1967 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | RS6 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4171 cc | 4733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 68 L |
