2005 Audi RS6 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 380 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi RS6 weights approximately 905 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 464 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi RS6 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Audi | Riley |
| Model | RS6 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 25 L |
