2005 Audi RS6 vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 325 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi RS6 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi RS6 | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | RS6 | Celica |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2640 mm |