2005 Audi RS6 vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,171 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi RS6 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi RS6 | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | RS6 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4171 cc | 2259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2680 mm |
