2005 Audi RS6 vs. 1985 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 4,171 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi RS6 weights approximately 425 kg more than 1985 Mercury Sable.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi RS6 | 1985 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Audi | Mercury |
| Model | RS6 | Sable |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1985 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4171 cc | 2937 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
