2005 Audi RS6 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 4,171 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi RS6 weights approximately 617 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi RS6 | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | RS6 | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4171 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 132 L |
