2005 Audi RS6 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi RS6. (580 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi RS6. 2005 Audi RS6 has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Audi RS6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi RS6 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | RS6 | HRT |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 580 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
