2005 Audi RS6 vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Audi RS6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 500 kg more than 2005 Audi RS6.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2005 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi RS6 | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | RS6 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4171 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3510 mm |