2005 Audi RS6 vs. 2006 GMC Savana
To start off, 2006 GMC Savana is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2006 GMC Savana. (295 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Savana weights approximately 538 kg more than 2005 Audi RS6.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Savana. (455 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi RS6 | 2006 GMC Savana | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | RS6 | Savana |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 455 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2353 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 117 L |