2005 Audi RS6 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,171 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP) has 291 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi RS6 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | RS6 | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4171 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |