2005 Audi RS6 vs. 2012 Nissan NV
To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2012 Nissan NV. (317 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan NV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan NV weights approximately 883 kg more than 2005 Audi RS6.
Because 2005 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan NV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan NV. (521 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan NV.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi RS6 | 2012 Nissan NV | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | RS6 | NV |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4171 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 521 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 2708 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 6111 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2156 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3711 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 106 L |