2005 Audi S4 vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2005 Audi S4 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi S4 (340 HP) has 232 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi S4 weights approximately 987 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi S4 (410 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 2005 Audi S4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi S4 | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Audi | Reliant |
| Model | S4 | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 798 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 38 L |
