2005 Audi S4 vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi S4 would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi S4 (340 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Commander. (322 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 620 kg more than 2005 Audi S4.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (500 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi S4. (410 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi S4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi S4 | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | S4 | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 5652 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 500 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 15.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 78 L |