2005 Audi S4 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi S4 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi S4 (340 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi S4 weights approximately 290 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi S4 (410 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm). This means 2005 Audi S4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi S4 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | S4 | 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 2486 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 228 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |