2005 Audi S4 vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi S4 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi S4 (340 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2012 Jaguar XJ. (271 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 2012 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 78 kg more than 2005 Audi S4.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi S4. (410 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi S4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi S4 | 2012 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | S4 | XJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 600 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 1813 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3157 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 82 L |